Yes, like most of the the other anti-DoH argument, this SPOF argument makes zero sense. It's no more or less of a SPOF than your existing provider.
-
-
Definitely not with you on this one Tavis. It fails my "mum" test as DoH has made browsing from home a nightmare for her. When I turned it off and went back to the ISP's it became a breeze again. DoH is the perfect example of an arrogant bunch assuming the world is their net.
-
To answer your deleted tweet: surfing had slowed to treacle. She is off borrowed WiFi on a minor Italian ISP. The ISP's DNS do an excellent job, DoH failed to resolve fast enough. Was convinced her laptop was the issue and about to fork out for a new one.
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Honestly, I don't see _obvious_ in-browser DoH benefits at all, and I live in a country with censorship, which sometimes is performed by spoofing DNS answers or by redirecting DNS queries to all internet IP addresses to ISP's DNS server. >
-
I'm not against DNS encryption per se, it's nice, but why not to implement DoH/DoT resolver as e.g. an external program, ship it with Chrome/Firefox to make it work OS-wide, and make it optional then, like Android did?Or why not to make a step further and embrace DoT-enabled NS?>
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I hope this will be food for thought: https://youtu.be/QL4bz3QXWEo ....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
