This letter from the US service provider industry is quite something. It talks about "data competition" which implies people's data are a legit thing to sell. They also note that encrypting DNS would harm the advertising business. This is why we do not trust the US industry.https://twitter.com/BoingBoing/status/1181206454281396224 …
If you're talking about Mozilla, they have a detailed explanation of how they choose a DoH partner here https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/DOH-resolver-policy …. If you're talking about Chrome, they only upgrade to DoH if you've *already* elected to use a resolver that supports it.
-
-
Is there any information on how the Mozilla Foundation makes sure those requirements are met? Who is doing the audit of potential DoH partners? I like the way Chrome handles it, as it leaves the decision up to the end-user.
-
Your question is how will Mozilla ensure somebody doesn't violate a legally-binding contract? I mean, if "legally" isn't a good enough answer, I don't know what to tell you. That seems better than the agreement you have with the free hotel wifi provider. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/dns-over-https-doh-faqs#w_what-is-the-privacy-policy-for-dns-over-https …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.