What would you like clarified? Happy to.
-
-
Replying to @eastdakota @floorter and
I have a question; It seems like a fair point that EU people may lose strong regulatory protection because Cloudflare is a US entity. IANAL, is that true even if you anycast to EU vip, and if so, could you operate a legal entity in EU to silence that criticism?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @taviso @eastdakota and
As far as I can determine the processing by Cloudflare falls under Privacy Shield. Legally that's considered good enough from a European perspective for now. Possible transfer of personal data to APNIC might be problematic.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
That’s correct. We have presence in London (EU for a bit longer) and Lisbon and comply with Privacy Shield and GDPR. Counter intuitively, we have *much* stronger protections against US gov’t requests as a US-based global company. But understand that’s not the general perception.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @eastdakota @taviso and
I see your point. However the adequacy of the protection in article 45 of the GDPR is not just tested against protection measures against the gouvernement as a threat actor.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso @eastdakota and
I don't want to mix what I believe to be three topics: the adequacy of Privacy Shield, the benefits of DoH as a protocol and transfer the default setting to Cloudflare.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wonder if Tavis has ever checked with those millions (outside of US of A) if they agree with him?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
So you just assumed I am PowerDNS? Wonder what else you mistakenly assume...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, I've seen you defend PowerDNS, so assume you are connected somehow. Didn't you just assume I'm American? 
-
-
No?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.