I know, you always say the same thing - only PowerDNS™ customers can be trusted, everyone else has malicious motives they're not revealing. I think this is a weak and transparent argument, and you're going to look as silly as the people who argued against HTTPS 10 years ago 
Certificate pinning isn't intended to protect against malware, it's intended to protect against misissued certificates. You're correct that encryption doesn't protect against malware on compromised endpoints, I don't know what to tell you. 
-
-
Well what you are telling me is that the local threat model isn't important
-
You can read about the official position on this here, hope this helps
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/security/faq.md#Why-arent-physically_local-attacks-in-Chromes-threat-model … - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



