The problem is you are one of the lucky few who only use trustworthy networks. Many people do not have that luxury, like the customers of the ISPs in the article above. Is it your opinion that it just sucks to be them, and we should do nothing?
-
-
Replying to @taviso @Cron2Gert and
So denying people control over DNS and whisking off queries to a jurisdiction with weaker privacy legislation is beneficial if their network is untrustworthy? I see.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alzimon @Cron2Gert and
Yes, if your network is untrustworthy "whisking off" the queries to a trustworthy network seems like a good idea to me. Nobody is denying anyone control, what are you basing that on?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @taviso @Cron2Gert and
For one thing, as I understand it, centralised DoH will let browsers and appliances circumvent my own (and any state-mandated) DNS-based blocklists. Furthermore, what I consider trustworthy is for me to decide. Information Ssecurity is about control.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alzimon @Cron2Gert and
Absolutely not, this is just about choosing safe defaults. Nobody is suggesting you shouldn't be allowed to choose who is trustworthy. If you're lucky enough to only ever use trustworthy networks, great! Many people are not that lucky, and we should help them, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
As long as you define yourself as trustworthy, this is fine advice. Or in the words of a wise former coworker of yours: “I trust me; why shouldn’t everyone else trust me too?”
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PowerDNS_Bert @Alzimon and
Tavis Ormandy Retweeted
Do you agree that the customers of the ISPs in the article you posted yesterday are getting a pretty bad deal? I understand some of those ISPs are probably PowerDNS customers, and you might not want to criticise them, but just in general? https://twitter.com/PowerDNS_Bert/status/1181212034878361601 …
Tavis Ormandy added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso @PowerDNS_Bert and
I personally think that this deal that Mozilla and Cloudflare agreed to sounds like a better default. However, users should be able to use their ISP if they prefer their policy - no argument there. https://developers.cloudflare.com/1.1.1.1/commitment-to-privacy/privacy-policy/firefox/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso @PowerDNS_Bert and
I know, you always say the same thing - only PowerDNS™ customers can be trusted, everyone else has malicious motives they're not revealing. I think this is a weak and transparent argument, and you're going to look as silly as the people who argued against HTTPS 10 years ago
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll end it here - I said nothing like that, if you are going to invent things I say the discussion is going nowhere. Cheers.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I'm sorry, but that is a lie Bert. You *always* question my motives, and claim PowerDNS has no conflict of interest. It is your default argument, I have asked you repeatedly to stop the personal attacks and you continue.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.