Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
taviso's profile
Tavis Ormandy
Tavis Ormandy
Tavis Ormandy
Verified account
@taviso

Tweets

Tavis OrmandyVerified account

@taviso

Vulnerability researcher at Google. This is a personal stream, opinions expressed are mine.

California
taviso.decsystem.org
Joined April 2008

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. halvarflake‏ @halvarflake 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob

      Hm. I am intrigued. Can you point me to science that says man-made warming isn't going to cause massive upheaval & economic as well as ecological damage?

      2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
    2. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @halvarflake

      Well, no, I can't refute such a statement with science because you haven't made a scientific statement. I can't disprove with numbers a statement that has no numbers. How much economic damage? How much ecological damage?

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
    3. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      Warming causes ecological change, not damage. It's within the normal range of interglacial temperatures, at least for the next hundred years. Humans are causing massive ecological damage in ways that aren't due to warming.pic.twitter.com/PYYp9CXXUk

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      Humans are causing a mass extinction event, due to pollution, pesticides, and dramatic transformation of the landscape. By comparison, "ecological damage" caused by manmade warming is relatively minor.

      4 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
    5. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      As for economic damage, sure there is some, but how much? Specifically, how much compared to the economic damage of things like the Green New Deal?

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      Cheap carbon-based energy has enormous benefits to our standard-of-living. It's why when you strip out the ideological rhetoric that addressing the problem is so hard: it has immediate economic impact.

      3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    7. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      In any case, I meant things like how every time hurricanes hit, people blame global warming, even though the science is pretty clear that manmade warning has not yet made a detectable difference.pic.twitter.com/fHzrXblBST

      3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    8. Tavis Ormandy‏Verified account @taviso 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      Hmm, the text in that screenshot doesn't seem to match your interpretation i.e. "science is clear manmade warming has not made a difference". In context, it seems to say it probably has ("tentative link", "consistent with"), but too soon to say conclusively?

      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
    9. Robᵉʳᵗ Graham 😷‏ @ErrataRob 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @taviso @halvarflake

      My interpretation isn't "not made a difference". It's "not made a detectable difference".

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Tavis Ormandy‏Verified account @taviso 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      Right, but in that text you screenshotted it clearly says there *is* a detectable difference ("detectable shift", "observed increase", "highly unusual") and a likely - but not conclusive - link to human activity.

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
      Tavis Ormandy‏Verified account @taviso 24 Sep 2019
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @taviso @ErrataRob @halvarflake

      They literally used the word "detectable" 😛

      6:45 PM - 24 Sep 2019
      • 5 Likes
      • Alex Lindgren Kevin 'stads' Stadmeyer Weltschmerz
      1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
        1. Tavis Ormandy‏Verified account @taviso 24 Sep 2019
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @taviso @ErrataRob @halvarflake

          You're not willing to revisit your position on this? You said "Nobody reads the science", but you selected the source and cherry-picked a sentence, if you actually read the context it seems like your position doesn't match the science... no?

          0 replies 1 retweet 18 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info