They could do terrible things with or without DoH, right? I don't understand the connection. I get the "going dark" argument, but the other arguments seem weak.
We're just going in circles here. The difference is that by connecting to free coffee shop wifi, I'm not explicitly stating I want them to monitor my activity. That should not be the default.
-
-
So the default should be a for-profit intelligence agency should be the only one who can do the snooping?
-
I think there shouldn't be any snooping going on at all. We can't enforce that technically yet, but we can enforce it by making the default an organization that's contractually bound to respect privacy. Make sense?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. It seems pretty arbitrary to be concerned about monitoring for exfiltration via DoH, but not arbitrary other means of tunnelling DNS (e.g. DNS over SSH), or just any other protocol.

