You're wording it like you want to defend users privacy though - which is disingenuous, right? I think you mean, you're fed up with not being able to monitor users use of your network? That's fine, but if you can do it, so can malicious admins, so it shouldn't be the default...
-
-
It's just the default, nobody is suggesting taking away the options. The default shouldn't be to trust whoever can set DHCP option tags though, because there is no way to determine their intentions. I'm sure your reasons are noble, but "Airport Free WiFi" admin might not be....
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think this is a really disingenuous argument. You're opposed to it because it will make it harder to monitor users, you're not opposed to it for privacy reasons, right?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ah, you're opposed to centralized monitoring of users, but a proponent of decentralized monitoring of users? In that case, a RR solution like I suggested would work, right?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't follow. The original tweet said "DNS privacy is a huge issue", do you agree with that? The core part of agreeing with that would be that network operators should not automatically be able to see the DNS queries of their users without permission.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ah, so you're argument is that if I join "McDonald's Free WiFi", I am explicitly stating that I trust McDonalds, and opting-in to be monitored by them. I think that's just plain not true for the *vast* majority of users. I don't even trust my ISP, let alone Starbucks 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.