Does it abort or silently fail? The latter is CVE-worthy.
I'm not a docker user, other people were reporting my code wasn't working and I couldn't reproduce...turns our they were using docker. If you think a patch to enable on x86 would be accepted, I'll try that.
-
-
As a temporary fix you can tell people to grab this seccomp file (https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/profiles/seccomp/default.json …), add sigprocmask there and run containers with `docker run --security-opt seccomp=profile.json`
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it would be accepted, I'll LGTM it. I don't think there are any adverse issues by allowing this on x86.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Docker should be fixed. While glibc is wrong, the syscall shouldn't be failing, especially if current glibc is (even wrongly) using it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
