I disagree, you just have to optimize your work differently. Prefer volume over quality, not wasting time improving reliability when you could be finding more bugs, and so on. If it will take you a month to turn a bug into an exploit, calculate if the reward justifies that, etc.
It was an example of just how many options are available. You literally cannot think of *any* way to gather intelligence other than exploits?
-
-
Signals intelligence (and cne) is a much less risky than others. And we shouldn't rely on a single source of intel anyway. Both of you are making valid points. There is no correct answer here. The competing interests are exactly why equities review process in US gov exists.
-
Sure, and signals intelligence predates iphone exploits. I agree there is no correct answer, the thread started because it was being presented as a solved problem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.