I'm trying to be difficult because I think you're being disingenuous saying you're not against DNS encryption, while actively pushing for more monitoring? OK 
I understand that you've implemented DNS encryption, but the NSA implemented and promoted Skipjack, a block cipher. The purpose of implementing it was not because they were pro-encryption, it would be disingenuous to claim otherwise, right?
-
-
Now that you keep mentioning the NSA, I asked specifically about whom you'd want to encrypt DNS *to*. It turns out every US company has a MAJOR vulnerability on that front - it must respond to FISA 702, which offers scant protection to non-US persons. So endpoint matters a lot!
-
You are throwing a lot of chaff out here, which makes me think my observation that you're trying to hedge against an unpopular opinion was accurate. Let's stick to the point, I don't want to argue if monitoring is good or bad - just that its disingenuous to call it pro-encryption
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.