I think you are *trying* to be difficult, which is a shame. Goodbye.
The difference is that you think network operators should be able to see end-user queries, and I don't think that's compatible with "I'm pro DNS encryption"? I have no idea how you got to "Cloudflare and Google" from that?
-
-
I understand that you've implemented DNS encryption, but the NSA implemented and promoted Skipjack, a block cipher. The purpose of implementing it was not because they were pro-encryption, it would be disingenuous to claim otherwise, right?
-
Now that you keep mentioning the NSA, I asked specifically about whom you'd want to encrypt DNS *to*. It turns out every US company has a MAJOR vulnerability on that front - it must respond to FISA 702, which offers scant protection to non-US persons. So endpoint matters a lot!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No, I need to know what people are arguing FOR? We have a status quo, unencrypted DNS to a local network provider, we now have encrypted protocols, which I advocate for. But what do you advocate for beyond "more encryption"? Should the browser pick something for you? If so, what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
