Yes, I looked at it, and as I said, it reads like you're hedging against an unpopular opinion. e.g. "I'm pro encryption, but it must be escrowed with the proper authorities" is not what most people would consider a pro-encryption stance, right?
-
-
Replying to @taviso
where do you read about me talking about proper authorities? But I'd vastly prefer a DNS world that somehow had caching AND end-to-end encryption without data mining companies hovering up my every move online, does that help?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PowerDNS_Bert
It was just an example, you didn't say that. I think you do believe that network admins must be able to view dns queries though, which is kinda like arguing for escrowed encryption.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso
Yes, if you run a network, I think you should be able to control what happens on your network. I would hate a world that is so locked down I have no visibility on what stuff is doing. Compare a Nest with a secret microphone in it. I'd love to monitor such a device in my house!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PowerDNS_Bert
I think you're doing it again, hedging against an unpopular opinion. You just said your concern is caching, but now it's network monitoring. Is it fair to say you do not think end-users should be able to encrypt dns queries in such a way that network operators can't read them?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso @PowerDNS_Bert
Because most people would not call that being "pro dns encryption"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @taviso
I think you are *trying* to be difficult, which is a shame. Goodbye.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PowerDNS_Bert
I'm trying to be difficult because I think you're being disingenuous saying you're not against DNS encryption, while actively pushing for more monitoring? OK
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taviso
I think you really do not get what I mean. You conflate how I'd like to control my own network (which is true) with that I am "pushing for more monitoring" by "proper authorities" & that I do not want end-users to have privacy. And despite my retorts, you keep believing that 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PowerDNS_Bert @taviso
But let me then ask you some questions. Do you advocate encrypting DNS for everyone & sending it straight to Google or Cloudflare, by default?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You're right, I do keep believing that, because I don't see how you can argue for more network monitoring and more privacy from network monitoring at the same time. You phrased the question strangely, but yes I think encrypting everything by default is a good idea.
-
-
Replying to @taviso
And encrypt to just anyone? Or does it matter where the plaintext ends up? I asked you specifically: do you advocate sending DNS by default (over an encrypted connection) to Google and Cloudflare.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PowerDNS_Bert
Yes, DNS queries should be encrypted by default, the answer doesn't change based on who you're querying. Where is this going Bert?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.