Please read your security history, specifically the history of Zardoz; then write a one-page essay on the ethics of withholding critical information (and hence agency) from at-risk minorities in order to protect a less-at-risk majority. I have more essay assignments after that.
-
-
If we had a perfect oracle that could tell us which vulnerabilities the bad guys had, then clearly not publishing the ones they dont have is the way to go, but that's not the world we live in.
-
I contend purely with the grounds on which decisions are made. The world is so no black-and-white. I don't find compelling "at-risk" or "minority" on the face of it. E.g. what's costlier? first-world country's power grid vuln; or minority activist privacy vuln. Need more data.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
