Please read your security history, specifically the history of Zardoz; then write a one-page essay on the ethics of withholding critical information (and hence agency) from at-risk minorities in order to protect a less-at-risk majority. I have more essay assignments after that.
-
-
The point is not whether something is irresponsible. It's to discern whether disclosure of a nature considered irresponsible by some (earlier disclosure) necessarily mitigates damage to at-risk minorities disproportionally to others.
-
Every form of disclosure is considered irresponsible by some, that's meaningless. In general, using the phrase "responsible" or "irresponsible" is a sign of bad faith in these discussions, so I don't want to respond to your other points, sorry

- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.