First of all things, im not a developer. I just read an article about chrome having performance problems cause of CFG. Then i turned it of for testing and all my problems on some games that i sometimes play vanished. Then i found other threads about it.
Sure, but those quick diversions are cumulative, we can't just add an unlimited number and expect everything to stay performant. It doesn't harm security, but it provides so little benefit that I wouldn't (as a security guy) object to someone disabling it. 
-
-
Cumulative, but nothing relative to the overhead you add by rewriting a C++ program in C#. Less flippantly, each diversion is roughly comparable to a WPP trace when nobody's consuming - and although I wrote somewhere long ago that this all adds up, nobody even talks about it now.
-
The one C++ program that I rewrote in C# ended up being faster after the rewrite. Profiles showed that memory allocations were its biggest cost, and the C# allocator is extremely fast. Your mileage may vary. Sorry for the brief derailment
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
