Frankly, "Surely you get this?" Doesn't read like you want a good faith discussion. Nevertheless, I will repeat (again again) that the issue here is that we do not have unlimited goodwill to burn, and cannot continually ask users to adopt new solutions to the same problems.
I don't get it, why can't you just say yes or no? If all you can do is homeopathy (literally, not ginger or aromatherapy, actual homeopathy), should you? (If you don't know, homeopathy is literally just placebo, it's some nonsense about water memory)
-
-
I’m not dodging the question, I’m saying it’s being delivered on a false premise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And fair point! That’s fucking weird. So my other point still stands then that your premise is false. 2FA is not completely ineffective, it can be very effective. So if I can achieve “very effective” while I work on “super effective” should I not?
-
We both definitely agree you should grasp any improvement you can, no matter how small. That is not what 2FA is, it's more like rearranging deckchairs on the titanic
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.