I think you've mixed your metaphors here, aspirin is not placebo. We're all on the same page that attackers do have to make changes to accommodate 2FA, that is self-evident. The debate is you think that's worth burning the limited goodwill we have for security, and I don't. 
"Hey boss @taviso said on Twitter that Homeopathy is the 2FA of medicine, so we are just going to save our money until we can deploy Antibiotics to everyone k?" ....Umm, yes, that sounds like a fantastic idea.
-
-
And what if an attack that could have been stopped by a basic 2FA implementation succeeds and costs you? Or doesn’t immediately cost you, but the reputational impact of the breach impacts revenue? You may be okay with that. Not everyone will be, or can be.
-
Please stop trying to turn this into a "don't let perfect be the enemy of the good" debate. That is not the issue. What about all the illnesses that could have been stopped by homeopathy? Not everyone will be okay with that Chris, get out of your ivory tower.
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
