Perhaps I misconstrued something, but I think comparing 2FA to homeopathy is incorrect. 2FA is not as strong a solution as it was, it’s not ideal, and it’s not going to protect anything, but it is better than nothing if options are limited or cost of moving forward is prohibitive
Yes, you don't need to reword your same argument dozens of different ways. You would burn all your budget to make attackers jump through a few hoops, I would rather save up for a real solution. I understand, I just disagree 
-
-
But if I can cheaply implement even sms based 2FA and it stops just a handful of attackers while I work towards a full on U2F solution the answer is yes. Part of that good will is accurately conveying the risks and trade-offs.
-
Perhaps homeopathy can be practiced safely if you accurately convey the risks and tradeoffs. The placebo effect is real, it might help a handful of people. Homeopathy is still trash though.
- 24 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
