Heh. FWIW, pointing out a potential interest was about the first thing I did when I spoke to @lorenzofb.
-
-
Yes, they would. They would even, if not always publicly, agree that AV isn't your biggest priority. Here's a funny thing: lots of AV vendor blogs are filled with advice for (home and corporate) users. A lot of this advice actually reduces the need for AV.
-
It's funny: AV is doing a pretty good job reducing the threat on all those legacy networks where half the desktops still run XP. But rather than boasting about it, AV vendors keep telling people to patch their systems, upgrade OS's. That's also why I believe AV aren't bad people.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Retrospective threat management is way longer to type than AV ... marketing will hate that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And I wish I’d get closer to the core of the latter. If some AV product prevents one infection out of twenty for the average user, do you consider that safer? Or less safe?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
