I don't think I concur that Bloomberg being right helps DHS. I can totally think of reasons that DHS would want to avoid panic. In your experience working with DHS, is it normal for them to deny a statement not directly involving them like this?
-
-
I don't think Amazon's denial was watertight. It was very carefully worded.
-
I work at a big corp, I'm telling you right now, I couldn't get you an on the record statement confirming water is wet approved that was more direct than Amazon's denial.

- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well if I was someone who was involved in a DOJ investigation that included three letter agencies. An the case has not come to a conclusion or is still ongoing. I would be worried about being prosecuted by the DOJ.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My only problem here is this 2016 article https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/report-apple-designing-its-own-servers-to-avoid-snooping/ … although this puts the blame on the NSA but it gives me pause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
