Everyone is on board w/preventing abuse. It's the bit about having to share intimate pictures that's worrying. You're dismissive whenever someone says there are technical solutions, if you've got some convincing evidence, why not share? (eg. why not sgx+photodna+review on match?)
I think that isn't going to happen, it's a tiny temp delay for a lot of lies and abusing a program for helping victims. Even if it you disagree, the alternative is mail humans your nudes for review, and allow them to be posted while the human verifies your claims.
-
-
For the revenge porn situation the photo has either been uploaded already or not. If not and a victim registers a hash through a channel, then any future uploaded photos matching the hash will get delayed and reviewed.
-
If the photo was already uploaded, the hash would locate it, and it can be reviewed and deleted right then. In neither case the victim has to upload their photos. (in this different hypothetical solution)
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.