It is a jarring shift from shortages but it is reality. Just Pfizer & Moderna are on track for 600 million doses by July. J&J supply is 10+ million per month. We have 100 million Novavax in the pipeline. US only has 260 million vaccine eligible people. https://twitter.com/Valentine721/status/1372184003063726087 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Remember how upset we got when we hard a few doses here and there were being wasted? US has at least thirty, likely about sixty million, *already manufactured* doses of vaccines that cannot be used here (no approval) and will NOT be approved in time. We can send them out today.
7 replies 143 retweets 537 likesShow this thread -
Most likely holdup here is the political perception. The administration doesn't want to be seen as sending vaccines while shortages are working their way through. But we can do the math here—these won't be approved in time—and give political support to the smart and humane path.
7 replies 27 retweets 279 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Josh Wingrove
Yes, of course. Soon enough we will be discussing giving away more of our excess because our pipeline truly exceeds our population likely by hundreds of millions. But, we can do that next month. These are doses needed NOW that we cannot and will not use.https://twitter.com/josh_wingrove/status/1372187510248509452 …
zeynep tufekci added,
Josh WingroveVerified account @josh_wingroveNEWS: Mexico and Canada are at the top of the list for U.S. vaccine exports, whenever they begin, per a US official. Biden said yesterday he's already speaking with countries about this. Mexico asked this week for AstraZeneca shots. Story on@TheTerminal.Show this thread6 replies 25 retweets 250 likesShow this thread -
Look, the US will release these vaccines we clearly won't use—eventually. They won't be approved in time here. The only question is timing. My point is we should do it NOW, especially with more transmissible variants spreading. A vaccine today is worth more than one in a month.
9 replies 44 retweets 466 likesShow this thread -
To folks saying AZ is an inferior vaccine so we shouldn't give it away even if we can't use it. "Not approved yet because US trial not concluded" doesn't mean inferior. Novavax looks spectacular (from trials elsewhere) but also not approved here because trial not concluded...+
7 replies 17 retweets 208 likesShow this thread -
... but it's definitely true that AZ rollout has been a spectacular mess, but that's separate. (I will probably rant on that in my newsletter). So far 11 million doses in UK, ~6 in Europe, 500,000 in Canada have been administered... It's not a vaccine just for poor/brown folk.
5 replies 12 retweets 152 likesShow this thread -
We can figure out the politics of where AZ should go. There are countries with large outbreaks (especially of that terrible B117 variant) in Europe, for example. Other countries elsewhere may ask for them, solving the "optics" issue. What's on us is to demand they get used, now.
7 replies 11 retweets 129 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted 4030Lisa
Because it's not endangering anyone. It's approved in the UK, Canada, EU and through the WHO coalition, in 140+ countries and has been given to 17 million people in UK and EU. The US FDA requires the trials it requires, and that's a different discussion.https://twitter.com/4030lisa/status/1372230955973410816 …
zeynep tufekci added,
4030Lisa @4030lisaReplying to @zeynepWhy would you choose to endanger others with a vaccine that has not gone through even the minimal rigors of safety testing we currently have? If we cannot release it here because of safety reasons, it should not be sent to jeopardize others for safety reasons elsewhere,either.9 replies 16 retweets 218 likesShow this thread -
zeynep tufekci Retweeted Chad Crichton
I don't have a strong opinion on where they go—there are many choices, but yes, whatever is going on in EU is an issue. However, as you can see below, Canada—facing a potential B117 surge in many locations—has approved them, would use them, and needs them.https://twitter.com/chadcrichton/status/1372239202293780480 …
zeynep tufekci added,
Chad Crichton @chadcrichtonReplying to @chadcrichton @jaimedash @zeynepPeople I know in their 40s in the U.S. have already gotten a shot, Alaska's letting 16 year olds sign up, and here in Ontario my Mom (73) can't even sign up for an appointment yet. Eventually Canadians are going to get mad at our doses coming from Europe & India but not Michigan.9 replies 13 retweets 152 likesShow this thread
Canada is desperate. My mom is 76 stage IV cancer in Toronto and won’t be allowed to sign up until April 15. On March 15 they opened sign ups for 80+.
-
-
Replying to @tanjamaier17 @zeynep
Which is unfair because my healthy 60 year old father was signed up for his AstraZeneca next week. Hopefully the recent approval for 65+ will get things moving faster.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.