15/ This first relation is divided in turn according to an expressly political split that overdetermines it, but in an internal way, as if it were the relation, not its terms, that is divided:
-
Show this thread
-
16/ reading, writing, signifiying practice, or atextual forces can receive a fascistic usage (subordination of the revolutionary pole to the fascistic pole) or a revolutionary pole (inverse subordination).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
17/ We don't know what to put under these words of force or of atextual power, nor under the categories of Fascism and Revolution, of Mastery and Rebellion, which, of course, no longer have their expected meaning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
18/ It doesn't matter: let's forget the terms, let's attempt to move into the Quadripartition as relations-of-relation, let's stretch out the political subject to the four corners of the chiasmus.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
19/ It's precisely the categories of Fascism, Mastery, Rebellion that will change their political meaning according to this complex apparatus:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
20/ the fascistic pole will take on the meaning of an unlimited, planetary usage of the negation and production of technical, organizational effects of power and of mastery.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
21/ For the revolutionary or the rebel, a certain usage of the affirmation and production of effects of *active* resistance to all the powers that be.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
22/ We do not yet know what meaning to give these aforementioned categories, if not—this is too much or too little—that the singular logic of the quadripartition wills that Mastery and Rebellion in the Nietzschean sense be determined by specific criteria,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
23/ that they not be confused with what traditionally circulates under these names, and that they not be historical phenomena given immediately, but the manner for certain forces or powers to go to the end of what they can do. (End thread)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
PS: the first section of the book is called Political Materialism, and the first chapter of the book is titled The Two Politics of Nietzsche. Full citation: François Laruelle, *Nietzsche contre Heidegger*. Payot: Paris, 1977.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likesShow this thread
@threadreaderapp unroll please, thank you 
-
-
Replying to @tadkins613
Hola you can read it here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/992466777325101057.html … Share this if you think it's interesting.
0 replies 2 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.