Laruelle by his own admission has not read much Badiou, and has certainly not followed the four years of seminars on the immanence of truths.
Well. Clamor of Being is shit. So, I suppose Badiou deserves one in kind, am I right? Anti-Badiou may or may not be adequate, but his first essay on Badiou is concise and precise
-
-
My first reaction to Clamor of Being was your one, that it is shit. But over the years Badiou has been embarked in a becoming-deleuzian. And even if the details are wrong I think that Badiou cottoned on to an onto-theological element in Deleuze that Laruelle recognised too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.