i dare anyone to tell what’s real from fake
-
-
Replying to @nmgrm
The formal distinction between real and fake is fake.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr @nmgrm
*whispers* don’t tell him that formal distinctions are real distinctions
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @qdnoktsqfr @nmgrm
Well, I took you to be saying that the real distinction btw the two is fake, i.e. being only a modal distinction.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tadkins613 @nmgrm
Was just playing on the (weak) discursive paradox of a fake real distinction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A fake formal (-real) distinction between 'real' and 'fake' would permit, for e.g. virtual-real / actual-real (a formal (-real) distinction between real and real) right? ... Or am I tripping?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I want to say ‘I actually know what you mean, but I’m really not sure’, but instead will say that this is a good reiteration of something quite thematic in Deleuze’s work, at the very least starting with the notion of simulacra
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.