BREAKING: On October 5, I wrote—quoting my analysis from early 2017—that the Steele Dossier is "at least 80% correct." Today, Steele himself (the former Russia desk chief for MI6) told The Guardian the dossier is "70% to 90% accurate." So we're in accord: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/15/christopher-steele-trump-russia-dossier-accurate?CMP=share_btn_tw …https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/916074799335657472 …
-
-
Replying to @SethAbramson
Why would anyone do a report that is only partially correct?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DJNanaSickBeats @SethAbramson
He was collating raw intelligence that could then later be analyzed, verified, and corroborated.
1 reply 0 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @tadkins613 @SethAbramson
Thank you Sir. I am def not an expert on intelligence gathering. Is this normal protocol?
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DJNanaSickBeats @SethAbramson
I am not an expert either, but basically Steele had to rely on his sources that he had cultivated and vetted, and whom he believed provides solid intelligence. His goal was to gather that intel and collate it if it were credible to him. For others to analyze/verify/falsify.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @tadkins613 @SethAbramson
He made it up, he traded the 8 million he was paid for his credibility and a mountain of bullcrap
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
He made it up? K. He must be Nostradamus, cuz a whole variety of details and assertions have already been confirmed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.