BREAKING: On October 5, I wrote—quoting my analysis from early 2017—that the Steele Dossier is "at least 80% correct." Today, Steele himself (the former Russia desk chief for MI6) told The Guardian the dossier is "70% to 90% accurate." So we're in accord: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/15/christopher-steele-trump-russia-dossier-accurate?CMP=share_btn_tw …https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/916074799335657472 …
-
-
Replying to @SethAbramson
Why would anyone do a report that is only partially correct?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DJNanaSickBeats @SethAbramson
He was collating raw intelligence that could then later be analyzed, verified, and corroborated.
1 reply 0 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @tadkins613 @SethAbramson
Thank you Sir. I am def not an expert on intelligence gathering. Is this normal protocol?
7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DJNanaSickBeats @SethAbramson
Here is a rundown by an ex-CIA officer on the dossier that provides background for how it has been received by the IChttps://www.google.com/amp/amp.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/09/a_lot_of_the_steele_dossier_has_since_been_corroborated.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tadkins613 @SethAbramson
Thank you Taylor, that’s very nice of you, appreciate your time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Not a problem! A lot of stuff has happened in the past year that it is hard to stay abreast of the situation. And the dossier has been targeted by the right as made-up, and sometimes undercovered by media as corroborated after the fact.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.