This feed is two things: legal analysis from an attorney and tweets based on top-shelf MI6-derived intel. Conspiracy theories? Go elsewhere.
-
-
Replying to @SethAbramson
2) Anyone who thinks this feed predicts future events, is based on mysterious sources only I have, or spins theories isn't reading the feed.
3 replies 52 retweets 303 likes -
Replying to @SethAbramson
3) Because I practiced law and was an investigator, I sometimes say that something is likely happening IF common practice is being followed.
4 replies 51 retweets 281 likes -
Replying to @SethAbramson
4) I'd ask anyone who thinks I've claimed to have inside sources or thinks *I* think I'm some kind of shaman to unfollow me. That's not me.
7 replies 45 retweets 271 likes -
Replying to @SethAbramson
5) Only two things get me angry: (1) Trump (obv); (2) people who don't read this feed spreading claims I'm no different from a certain Brit.
20 replies 64 retweets 401 likes -
Replying to @SethAbramson
6) You want predictions that never come true from sources that don't exist, everyone knows where to look. It's not this feed. Never will be.
9 replies 50 retweets 353 likes -
Replying to @SethAbramson
7) All others: welcome! I promise top-shelf legal analyses, comments based on years of experience, and decent real-time political analysis.
18 replies 72 retweets 473 likes
You should also tweet more about your takes on postmodernism. Won't get as many likes, but I'm game to talk philosophy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.