Who was your professor? I may know him. And Derridians are crazy. I prefer Deleuze and Foucault myself.
-
-
Replying to @tadkins613
His name was Ned Leuchtner, from University of Illinois at Chicago
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellydraper
I don't know him. But that's ok! Thanks for answering. I would guess Foucault would be interesting for you considering your work.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tadkins613
I'm pretty big into working from a psychodynamic clinical orientation. Being a former English major has been super helpful, actually!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellydraper
I am an English and Philosophy major, and I am focusing on digital media and psychoanalysis, emphasis on Freud, Lacan and Laplanche
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tadkins613
Ahhh! I'm a Freud fan girl! Outside of the drive paradigm, anyway
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellydraper
Early Freud is best. Don't trust Strachey's translation. It's horribly bastardized with Greek neologisms. Fav book is 3 essays on sexuality
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tadkins613
Cool! I haven't read much more than his popular works; more studied his clinical orientation in re: clinical practice and history
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kellydraper
Laplanche revives what Freud turned away from, the seduction theory. But he universalizes it and generalizes it. Lemme see if I can find it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tadkins613
Oh wow, yeah I only know the basic background on that. I know it's considered a major black stain on his legacy
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well Laplanche revives it. Basis is that seduction isn't child molestation as Freud thought and then rejected
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.