"our thing is inclusive" phrasing tier listing
top tier: "marginalised genders"
high tier: "non-binary and women"
low tier: "women and non-binary"
rock bottom tier: "women and men" (yes, there is a prominent industry inclusivity org with this in their twitter bio)
-
-
absolutely valid points, and i agree that specificity is important - from my side i'm sick of feeling unwelcome in spaces that claim to be inclusive but are actually just for women and androgynous AFABs
-
Absolutely. It's not a competition but I think binary trans people are much more widely understood than NB people who companies often let fall into a sort of weird third 'other' category. Mixing up the order is defo a good idea though, I just shuffled our pronoun examples order
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
