Iowa general election matchups from the NYT/Siena poll (was Trump +10 in ‘16)pic.twitter.com/BeUrhIAMQ9
Show this thread
-
This would say that amongst undecideds, Mayor Pete wins handily which is likely bullshit but
this is if the election was held today, not if the election was held after months of bad press and stupid Trump tweets dunking on Pete, I doubt he'd hold up as well during an actual campaign
-
-
The NYT did this with their other weird national poll release a few months ago. If it’s the same concept, They’re using the 2016 electorate and overweighting older, white, non-college educated voters.
-
Yeah idk the methodology but in the UK it's pretty common to hold these sorts of polls, you just have to mentally adjust because the actual campaign is vastly different from the conditions of today. It's just an indicator - and a potentially bad one if the methodology is poor
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He got months of bad press, hecklers, tweets and character assassination from the populist left already. Seems he does just fine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.