-
-
Replying to @darlenecdavisg1 @Siubhan_H and
Dr. Zimmerman’s views were known at the time, the petitioners decided not to pursue that theory, and his views were since rejected repeatedly by vaccine court.https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/anti-vaccine-activists-revive-hannah-poling-case/ …
11 replies 24 retweets 65 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @darlenecdavisg1 and
His "views" may have been rejected; which simply means they were ignored. It doesn't address the fact that this expert has major concerns and educated conclusions re vaccines' injuries; for which he was fired. Your quack buddy's blog means nothing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @t3tragrammat0n @darlenecdavisg1 and
His views were rejected because there’s no data behind them. They’re just opinions, and ten years in, with little basis.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @darlenecdavisg1 and
Let the unbiased reader decide. PS: That would not be you Dorit.https://namelyliberty.com/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @t3tragrammat0n @darlenecdavisg1 and
Note there's no data here. None. As pointed out here. https://respectfulinsolence.com/2019/01/17/zimmerman-useful-idiot-for-antivaxers/ … Do you have any data to support your beliefs?
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
You keep linking extra long, super dry, bloviated, quack, fluff from your co-shill David Gorski's - aka "Orac" - blog (note: not a journal) conjuring up pro Pharma, pro vaccine subsidized, uber-biased, worthless opinions on actual vaccine experts. It's ludicrous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
N Young