the letter is addressed to Trump and places a bewildering spin on words like "innovation", "competitiveness", "export"
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
It takes a heavily nationalist view which is ironic when many of our top doctoral students join us from all over the world.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'm glad to see orgs like
@SAEIntl and@IEEEorg missing from this list. Shame on@TheOfficialACM! -
Honestly surprised to see
@TheOfficialACM on there and@IEEEorg not, given the fact that IEEE tends to be more dickish about open access than ACM. I guess I'm on team#dumpACM AND team#dumpIEEE now... - Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
seems like the defense rests squarely on how much value we believe the publishing process (not done by volunteers) adds, and how important the paywall business model is to that. personally, I think it makes more sense for folks to pay for publishing/editing services directly
-
but, now that i write that, we pay separately for publishiing support (e.g., sheridan), so more like how much do we like ACM existing in its current form, and why aren't we willing to pay for it directly (via subscriptions)?
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Signed by the ACM as well.
#NotInMyNameHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
There is absolutely not any defense of this letter.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
wow this is appalling
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.