I have a theory, that circumcision of boys is known to be harmful to the boys and to public health policy... but the foreskins are harvested to transfer their health benefits from the mutilatees to those with skin conditions in a completely unbalanced socialist ritual of pain.
If you want to stop the economic incentive to continue the barbarism, you have to make the cost of continuing to participate in it too high for the buyers of the harvest. (In fact, we should start calling institutionalized circumcision patterns "the foreskin harvest".)
-
-
Harvesting something from males that is illegal to harvest from females. The human foreskin harvest, to create something for the benefit of a much smaller group of skin-condition sufferers.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.