@swinshi for easy comparison why not use the same periods as @ptcherneva's chart? ... nice to replicate then contrast
-
-
- Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
.
@adamgurri@ModeledBehavior@ptcherneva will put it out for Monday morning. Gist: http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottwinship/2014/04/17/whither-the-bottom-90-percent-thomas-piketty/ …Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@swinshi@ptcherneva we can still be concerned about widening disparity pre tax pre transfer, right? even if current redistrib working well -
.
@Claudia_Sahm@ptcherneva will have more to say about pre-tax and -transfer: have to ditch retirees for meaningful trend in that regard - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
.
@ernietedeschi@Claudia_Sahm@ptcherneva Just tweeted out the pre-tax, post-transfer chart. Will keep digging.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@swinshi Don't think this debunks. We can debate the measurements (esp CBO labor share) but I ask a diff Q from yours. Apples & oranges. -
.
@ptcherneva with respect, Piketty-Saez data simply cannot be used for any meaningful analyses of bottom 90%. Not even for market income.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Via
@swinshi, so much for the gamechangiest inequality gamechanger that ever changed the inequality game:https://twitter.com/swinshi/status/515577944719503360 …
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
@swinshi@ptcherneva The devil's advocate would ask if it is distributionally optimal that about half of income growth goes to 10% of pop. -
.
@ojessen@ptcherneva sure, different question. Hard to answer if you think it’s 100% instead of 50% - Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.