YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
-
-
If they were treated as a publisher, these sites could then be held civilly, and in some cases criminally, liable for the content they allow. They could also be subject to libel and defamation suits, which they are currently exempted from due to not being a publisher. 2/2
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.