A lot of credible scientists do disagree. I guess they are not credible. Or not credible because they disagree with you?
A phony number and it stems from money, funding and politics. It's not truthful and masks truthful debate.
-
-
The science is indisputable. You obviously can't comprehend data analysis and relatively simple science.
-
No, there is great science that disputes what you say is indisputable. It gets buried, condemned.
-
I'm a scientist that needed to be convinced. The data is indisputable. Deniers are alt-right propaganda.
-
Since you are so impassioned and say you are a true scientist, what's the harm in reading other views?
-
I have and continue to. The scientific data says it's real. Only tabloids like Washington Examiner question
-
That's just untrue. Truthful debate about this issue has been shamefully blocked thanks to politics.
-
Ok I'll bite. Tell me what I should read (that is based on scientific evidence!) to convince me I'm wrong.
-
Ok. How about Judith Curry? Or follow
@ClimateDepot or@ClimateRealists. They link to research/articles. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.