The formal veto-proof majority is not the same as the functional one. Functionally, the House has it.https://twitter.com/steventdennis/status/667416178638352384 …
-
-
Replying to @MEPFuller
@MEPFuller Not sure about that. An override vote is a different vote.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @StevenTDennis
@StevenTDennis@MEPFuller But by that logic, Steve, 290 doesn't really matter. Either people will stick to today's position or they won't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benpershing
@benpershing@MEPFuller Yes. But easier to break 2 pairs of arms than 4 etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StevenTDennis
@StevenTDennis@benpershing@MEPFuller So I spoke with the Parliamentarian just now.Veto override # is for the DAY of that vote...so...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@StevenTDennis @benpershing @MEPFuller Number will depend on who shows up on THAT day. If 434 are present (one vacancy) then 290 are needed
11:23 AM - 19 Nov 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.