also false MT @DavidMDrucker: defunding Obama's "exec amnesty" not Constitutionally possible: http://washex.am/1F81tI5 h/t @susanferrechio
-
-
Replying to @danholler
@danholler@susanferrechio Have to admit this one confuses me. It is clever, though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@susanferrechio and horrifying that the chairman of appropriations doesn't realize congress can write laws.1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @danholler
@danholler@susanferrechio Not arguing they can't write a law to direct how money is spent. But says outside of Approps process. FWIW1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@susanferrechio they can attach rider if they wanted to. they do this all the time when convenient. they're making an excuse1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@susanferrechio yup. frustrating to see good reporters take the committee's word on something so obviously wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danholler
@danholler@DavidMDrucker Whose taking their word? I'm just reporting what they say, and I also include what opponents of this plan say.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @susanferrechio
@susanferrechio@danholler In some ways it's specious argument cuz Obama will never sign anything they might send him - or he wouldn't do it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DavidMDrucker @danholler If they do 12 separate bills, that'd give GOP some options, but it's still risky for them politically.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.