But I guess nothing is new about this. Tor has always been used and funded by the Navy and BBG, but I still support it and use it all the time.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Sensible choice. Trying to avoid leakage of soldiers' info and avenues to exploit them. Be interesting if this results in bolstering the tech itself, potentially of benefit to all users.
-
That would be the Tor model. But Snowden docs also showed thorough research into deanonymization, so I assume there will always be a bit a fraction of vulnerabilities kept private.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
More than they already did, you think?
-
I assume a thorough vulnerability assessment would have been conducted before such a serious recommendation. So, I dunno. I hate being defeatist, but, if not Signal, what?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
To preface -- I don't pretend to be a security expert, but care about my privacy on Signal. I assume the US cares about protecting its soldier's communications and would study vulnerabilities. Zetter's book lays out history of how defense and offense are linked.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.