Alexis Sukrieh
Pedro Melo
@sukria So having browsers giving me better tools for that is always a welcome addition
Why refusing third-party cookies will be worse for users privacyhttp://blog.sukria.net/2013/02/27/why-refusing-third-party-cookies-will-be-worse-for-users-privacy/ …
-
-
-
@pedromelo you didn't read what I said, this will lead to a far worse experience for you, as a user who cares about privacy (as I do). - View other replies
-
@sukria No because fingerprinting was inevitable anyway. The only way to keep yourself private is to block their beacons -
@pedromelo Fingerprinting is heavily encouraged (de facto) by these actions. That's the whole point. - View other replies
-
@sukria but fingerprinting was inevitable anyway… Do you really think ad networks would not use it even if they could set cookies? -
@pedromelo I don't "think", I know. Sorry. But from where I work, I have a very good sight on that. They're moving to FP because they need - View other replies
-
@sukria And my move is to block them. It is a cat&mouse war - Show more
-
-
-
@sukria I pay for most of my services I use on the web: mail, news (4 services), hosting, etc… I pay for the right of my privacy -
@pedromelo the classic shocked reaction "I pay for everything online" which is a bit of a lie. Facebook, Twitter, Google are powered by ads - View other replies
-
@sukria Not questioning that, but I don't depend on Facebook and Twitter, they could die tomorrow… As for google, I do pay them $$
-
-
-
@sukria Do Not Track was the most naive browser feature ever implemented by browsers -
@sukria "The Do Not Track header was a very good idea" But not making it the default. Same category of mistakes.
100% pac
Pierre Chapuis
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.