Dismissals, dispositions, and trial delays happen for all sorts of reasons, and shouldn't necessarily be tied to the DA, the same way charging decisions are, which DA's have sole discretion over. And what do overdoses have to go with the DA? It's a medical/public health issue.
There's nothing nuanced about answering the same public records requests to favorable columnists, and rejecting them to those who are not. In fact its illegal.https://loub.substack.com/p/boudin-broke-sf-sunshine-laws?justPublished=true …
-
-
No there's not. That's what you get when politics is intertwined with the criminal legal system. I believe all DA's and Sheriffs should be appointed, not elected, to remove these politics out of the system
-
Sure. When the world it re-imagined to your liking, it will be so. As it is, the question before us is: where's the outcome data from the SF DA's office. Why is the DA selectively complying public records requests.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.