Paul, you’ve already posted this video, which contains no support for your assertion, despite being shown evidence the assertion is false. You appear to be an inveterate liar who should be excluded from the civic discourse, which relies on a baseline assumption of integrity.
Anti-science would be ignoring the evidence that most closely samples the population of interest. Anti-science would be prescribing chemotherapy to all because cancer exists for some.
-
-
I know all of you fact free republicans want to ignore the reality that there is a pandemic & epidemiology, but like everything else data is only important or relevant where normalized against its peers. No comparing years of data for a local office isn't relevant.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


