A lot of people seem to think that “vote with your guts” means I want you to vote for someone you think wouldn’t ne a good president, or that it means you shouldn’t consider whether they’d be good. It doesn’t.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Vote for the person that you want to be president. I trust you. You got this.
Prikaži ovu nit -
You don’t know who’s most electable. I don’t know who’s most electable. Nobody knows who’s most electable. Vote for the person you think should be the president.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Warren and Sanders both seem like the right options for this moment in history. I won't be mad if it's not my first choice, as long as it's one of these two.
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I prefer their resumes to my gut. America's increasing preference for candidates with no elective experience is not a bandwagon I'll be jumping on no matter how popular it gets.
-
Voting for the person you think will be the best president counts as voting with your guts, in my book.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I think this argument makes the most sense when speaking about a person's identity, such as gender, race, or sexual orientation. I think it's a bit different when applied to a person's platform/coalition when compared to the electorate.
-
I can make an ideological/coalition-based electability argument in favor or against any of the three leading candidates in the race, though, and I have no idea which of those arguments is correct. (Also, Ayers and Wright were a HUGE source of electability worries in 2008.)
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.