Stu Smallwood

@stu_smallwood

Writes about the US empire in Korea (mostly). Articles at and Global Research. Kor-Eng translator. Twitter active since June 2018.

Canada
Joined October 2014

Tweets

You blocked @stu_smallwood

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @stu_smallwood

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Jul 26

    My latest : “The US administration’s reversion to a hardline approach and reluctance to declare an end to the Korean War as a confidence-building measure threatens to stall the peace process completely.”

    Undo
  2. 9 hours ago

    This guy uses quotes of two parade participants as proof that the NK govt has no intention of denuclearization. Funny how average NKoreans are usually depicted as completely powerless/indoctrinated/irrelevant—unless they can be used to bolster your argument against engagement

    This Tweet is unavailable.
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    20 hours ago

    Ok, so it is meaningless if they don't show ICBMs during a parade. Fine. But why on earth does then everyone freak out if they do?

    Undo
  4. 14 hours ago

    “Maximum pressure” was not only cruel/inhumane/an act of war, it was never a sustainable policy. The question is whether SK will be blocked off from the process of NK’s economic opening by the US (or whether the SK govt will allow SK to be blocked off). Here’s guessing it won’t.

    Undo
  5. 14 hours ago

    Sure looks like three decades of “strategic patience”/containment (sanctioning regular people to death while maintaining a policy of military belligerence) has worked! The NK people look primed to rise up and bring down the govt any day now! 🧐

    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    18 hours ago

    perhaps, but I can't help thinking there are some methodological problems present amongst some experts when both displaying nukes during parades and not displaying nukes during parades are both taken as evidence of unwillingness to denuclearise

    Undo
  7. Sep 9

    The obvious effort by NK to focus less on displays of military power—a clear gesture of future policy orientation domestically and an olive branch to the rest of the world—won’t matter. It will simply be ignored or spun as a ruse of some kind by most US media.

    Undo
  8. Sep 9

    The capacity and willingness of China and Russia to stand up to the US agenda, economically and militarily—a crucial reason why NK might continue to denuclearize even if the US remains belligerent. It’s not all about the US—this is true now more than ever.

    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Sep 6

    all three Kims have at one time or another stated their flexibility over the question of US troops in the South, yet it remains one of the hawks' favourite arguments that the North Koreans want nothing more than the US to leave

    Undo
  10. Sep 7

    Human rights concerns,the velvet glove over the iron fist of imperialism. Be wary of anyone who blows the HR whistle while calling for further isolation of N Korea. They’re just spear-carriers for empire, knowingly or not. Economic and social interaction=true way to help NKoreans

    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Sep 1

    I’m only one to report this! CIA: “SSCI ‘staff members’ visited the Salt Pit CIA black site in Afghanistan (codenamed COBALT) in late 2003. According to the CIA, the SSCI staff found it compared ‘favorably’ w/ detainee facilities at Bagram & Guantanamo.”

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Sep 1

    McCain’s funeral carried live on every major news network in Canada.

    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    Sep 1
    Undo
  14. Aug 31

    Sovereignty: “Supreme and independent power or authority in government as possessed or claimed by a state or community.” This is something South Korea clearly lacks, unless you don’t consider foreign policy an aspect of independent power or authority.

    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Aug 31

    Unbelievable. For those who say let the Koreans work it out, here’s evidence for why it’s not just up to the two Koreas, but that in fact the US remains a huge obstacle to peace. I’d say it’s time to organize another DMZ crossing.

    Undo
  16. Aug 29

    South Korea’s sovereignty is at stake. By that I mean the potential for sovereignty, which it hasn’t had since before Japanese occupation. Moon must say no to military drill resumption and test US sanctions. He must show the “alliance” depends on peace, not perpetual war with NK.

    Undo
  17. Aug 28

    There goes Pompeo intentionally getting it backwards again, pretending the Singapore agreement didn’t happen.

    Undo
  18. Aug 28

    Not sure where this is coming from, but I can tell you after the candlelight revolution, this sort of thing simply isnt happening.

    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Aug 28

    Abe and his LDP are doing all they can to drum up the North Korean "threat" so they can change Japan's peace constitution and become a full-fledged military force (under US tutelage, of course). That domestic imperative is totally missing from this and other coverage of Japan.

    Undo
  20. Aug 28

    Great work by@MoonofA on the media’s treatment of the not-at-all “belligerent” NK letter to Pompeo used as the excuse to cancel his trip to NK and basically declare the end of NK-US negotiations.Correction made by Reuters long after wide publication of original report—damage done

    Undo
  21. Aug 28

    If the letter contained what says, it was far from belligerent—more like “realistic”: negotiations could fall apart and NK may resume testing if theUS is not committed to peace before denuclearization. US cancelled due to unwillingness to follow Singapore agreemnt

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·