When you disrupt someone's subscription unnecessarily some percentage of these customers won't reestablish it. That translates to "Stripe costs merchant more because false positives kill unrelated subscriptions"
We're sorry for this trouble. We're digging into this deeper (we see the chat you just had with us) and we'll send you a follow-up email with a solution.
-
-
-
We do appreciate the feedback, and we’re looking into this now. We’ll be in touch via email shortly with an update.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Guys, the problem here isn't technical. Your logic and reasoning is faulty. I want to talk to your thinkers in your radar/fraud modeling department.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Existing customer's recurring subscription transactions are not suddenly fraudulent because the card later had a higher-fraud-scoring transaction somewhere else. So you kill ALL subscriptions customer had established previously w/all vendors?!?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.