Here’s the reason giving without stipulation is bad: when something is given without earning it, the expectation that it will always be there provides zero incentive to care for what is given and leaves the resource in disarray.
Give them a choice. Rehab or jail. If they choose rehab, then they are willing to be rehabilitated. If they choose jail, we still rehabilitate under more restrictive surroundings. Make them choose.
-
-
Is this assuming that a crime has been committed? Or is the scenario entertaining the idea jailing addicts for addicts?
-
entertaining the idea of jailing addicts for being addicts?**
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.