“Moms have a right to mutilate heir children” We should start cutting of clitoral hoods on female children as well then, too?
-
-
Replying to @shaaylizzlee @fitnessgeek38 and
How are they mutilated? Sometimes, there are medical reasons why it’s done - it’s not always for aesthetics. I didn’t want to run the risk of my boys having foreskin problems & having to be circumcised as a teen or adult, like 2 of my uncles had to.
7 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @StopVaxxedLies @fitnessgeek38 and
So instead you risked infant stress, trauma, infection, and amputation. What problems did they have with foreskin? Considering it’s really only practiced in America and predominantly Jewish countries
3 replies 0 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @shaaylizzlee @fitnessgeek38 and
Some of my uncles on my father’s side of the family have foreskins that are too tight, causing pain during an erection, as well as tears. My boys weren’t stressed, they didn’t cry (my husband was there to watch) & they healed without any problems.
5 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @StopVaxxedLies @shaaylizzlee and
you don't consider missing parts of your genitals a "problem". That is the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @shaaylizzlee and
What? When did I say that? I said their circumcisions healed without problems. Maybe read what I actually tweeted instead of putting words in my mouth.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StopVaxxedLies @shaaylizzlee and
you are wrong, They did not heal without problems. There have the extreme problem of Missing Parts of Their Genitals. That is a big problem. They are permanently damaged. This is just a fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @shaaylizzlee and
Given that I’ve seen my sons’ penises, & you haven’t, you cannot assert their healing was problematic, nor can you call my sons ‘damaged’. I’m not showing you their penises, so you’ll have to take my word for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @StopVaxxedLies @shaaylizzlee and
the very definition of circumcision is cutting off parts of the penis. Those parts are dead. His penis was injured and is missing parts. DId they grow back? Cutting off healthy parts of someones body without consent is problematic.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @shaaylizzlee and
Do you know how odd it is to have someone tweet about your child’s genitals as though they’ve seen it and the parents haven’t? It’s creepy. I know what my hubs & boys’ penises look like, you don’t. Just take my word - they are not scarred, or injured, or ‘damaged’.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
do you know how odd&creepy it is to have a child abuser talk about how cutting off parts of a baby's body with a knife isn't damaging? You married a victim of child abuse and allowed a new one to be created. Cutting off body parts creates scars. its a fact. parts missing= damage
-
-
Replying to @stopcuttingboys @shaaylizzlee and
I know victims of *actual* child abuse would disagree with you. My husband was never abused, & he doesn’t appreciate you calling him a victim of child abuse, let alone accuse us of child abuse. This is where our interaction ends.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.