If a woman is allowed to decide to even abort a child while pregnant, the mom has every right to decide if she wants to circumcise that child as well. Not your place 
-
-
What? When did I say that? I said their circumcisions healed without problems. Maybe read what I actually tweeted instead of putting words in my mouth.
-
you are wrong, They did not heal without problems. There have the extreme problem of Missing Parts of Their Genitals. That is a big problem. They are permanently damaged. This is just a fact.
-
Given that I’ve seen my sons’ penises, & you haven’t, you cannot assert their healing was problematic, nor can you call my sons ‘damaged’. I’m not showing you their penises, so you’ll have to take my word for it.
-
the very definition of circumcision is cutting off parts of the penis. Those parts are dead. His penis was injured and is missing parts. DId they grow back? Cutting off healthy parts of someones body without consent is problematic.
-
Do you know how odd it is to have someone tweet about your child’s genitals as though they’ve seen it and the parents haven’t? It’s creepy. I know what my hubs & boys’ penises look like, you don’t. Just take my word - they are not scarred, or injured, or ‘damaged’.
-
do you know how odd&creepy it is to have a child abuser talk about how cutting off parts of a baby's body with a knife isn't damaging? You married a victim of child abuse and allowed a new one to be created. Cutting off body parts creates scars. its a fact. parts missing= damage
-
I know victims of *actual* child abuse would disagree with you. My husband was never abused, & he doesn’t appreciate you calling him a victim of child abuse, let alone accuse us of child abuse. This is where our interaction ends.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
